Surcharging credit cards and calling it a ‘cash discount fee’ — Is it a good idea or bad idea?

Fun: Dr. Jonathan Nash meets some local kids during a volunteer trip in Thailand. Through the organization Global Crossroad/Asia Volunteers, he helped serviced three remote villages, using on-site health centers for water and electric hookups and operating space, and saw hundreds of patients, mostly kids, doing mostly extractions and simple fillings.

Best Card is the endorsed credit card processor of the ADA Member Advantage program and more than 40 state dental associations through which thousands of dental practices across the country are served. We’ve recently fielded a number of calls regarding surcharging, as many credit card processing companies are aggressively promoting the surcharge model under the guise of merchant savings. These processors will often use the term “Cash Discount Program” to describe their surcharge, and it is being heavily marketed because processors can earn significantly higher profits using this model. Is it legal? While surcharging is now legal in all but two states (Connecticut and Massachusetts), there are specific reasons why most businesses decide not to surcharge their customers. In the dental industry, these reasons may have an even greater impact.

Is it risky?  

Often, the real costs of surcharging may not be immediately apparent, so let’s start with a basic question: What does it cost to attract new patients, and what are patients worth to my bottom line?

A few quick datapoints :

  • $150-$300 – How much the average a dental office spends in marketing costs per patient acquired.
  • 17% – The average dental practice’s attrition rate; you need to exceed this in new patients to have a growing practice.
  • $4,500 – The average revenue generated by a single patient in their lifetime with the practice.

The key takeaways from this data are: new clients aren’t cheap to woo; positive word of mouth alone makes it difficult to outpace attrition; and the lifetime value per patient is substantial, so minimizing attrition is vital to the health of a practice.
Credit card surcharging is great for credit card processors, but not for the dentists that sign onto it. Here are a few of the reasons we do not usually recommend it for our dentists:

  1. Customers hate being surcharged. Recent studies show that between 65% and 95% of customers who have been surcharged are less likely to visit the business again. In dentistry, where patient loyalty is important to maintaining your patient base, these numbers should be a red flag. There’s a reason that major retailers have decided not to surcharge; competing for customer loyalty is tough enough, and all the more difficult if you’re angering customers.
  2. It’s a huge increase in cost. Most surcharge programs have a flat monthly fee to the practice ($40 is common), and then the patients are charged a 3-4% surcharge on their payments. Best Card’s average dental office has an effective rate (all rates &fees divided by total processed in sales) of around 2.18%. If your processor is charging 4% to your patients, they are making an additional 1.82% profit at your patients’ expense. All credit card processors have the same costs, so while Best Card makes a very small amount above that set cost, a processor running cards at 4% would make a huge profit margin. Why not simply raise your prices by 4% and keep the profit margin (that would have been going to the processor) for yourself?
  3. Virtual Credit Cards (VCC) issued by insurance companies will not allow a surcharge. These are issued with an exact balance; try to charge a penny more and they will decline. Since regulations require that you surcharge all credit cards if you surcharge any, you’d need to lower your fee for services so that the payment, after the 4% surcharge is added, equals the VCC balance. Which means you’ll be paying the inflated surcharge rate out of your own pocket! Worse still, the surcharge is also reported to the card issuer, and so you risk the insurance company noting the pre-surcharged amount (indicating you have a lower actual cost), prompting an audit that could reduce the UCR (Usual, Customary, and Reasonable) reimbursement that you receive for procedures.
    Now, let’s bring it back into our credit card processing wheelhouse. While surcharging is seemingly growing in popularity, market research studies have shown that more than 60% of respondents would not return to a merchant that had surcharged them.

Is it worth the risk? 

Let’s break down the math. Nationwide, dental practices have an average transaction of $250. On a 4% surcharging model, the fee to run a single $250 payment is $10, which is paid by the patient. While this does save your practice on processing costs, that $10 charge means that 60% of your patients may be so unhappy that they would considerswitching to an office down the street. So a practice that paid $150-$300 to bring in that patient, and that hopes to make $4,500 in revenue over the course of the relationship, has just set themselves up for thousands of dollars in potential losses to collect a nominal fee (and keep in mind that at Best Card’s 2.18%, the fee would be $5.45).

This is part of why we at Best Card tell offices: most patients don’t price shop, but if you surprise them with a last-minutefee, they may not come back. You’d be better off raising your stated prices for services 4%, keeping the profit, and upsetting far fewer patients.

Is it complicated?  

If you decide that you want to proceed on this course (and we can help you do so) your surcharge must abide by Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express regulations. Here are some of those requirements:

  • If you surcharge ANY credit cards, you must surcharge ALL credit cards. You cannot opt out of surcharging for individual transactions or card brands once you begin surcharging.
  • You can surcharge credit cards, but cannot surcharge any debit cards.
  • You are not allowed to surcharge cards for cardholders from states where surcharging is illegal. If your business is in New York, and the cardholder lives in Massachusetts or Connecticut, you are not allowed to surcharge.
  • You must register with all four card brands a minimum of 30 days in advance.
  • You must place notifications of surcharge at all payment stations and entrances to the business.

You are allowed to surcharge equal to your average fees paid over the past quarter – up to 4%. To avoid recalculating, many processors will set pretty steep flat rates of 4% on all cards. And it doesn’t matter if your processor calls it a “cash discount”; if a fee is added to credit card transactions, it is a surcharge, and these regulations must be followed.

Bottom line?  

Cost-saving measures that end up costing your business in the long run simply do not make sense. While Best Card can provide surcharging systems, we prefer to offer consistently low rates to ensure that your monthly bill is as low as possible. This is one reason that the average dental practice saves 24% in card processing fees with Best Card. Call 877-739-3952 or visit to learn about the many processing options available, including automatic payment posting into dental software.

Phillip Nieto is the president of Best Card. After leaving behind the legal world, Phil has enjoyed the positivity of working directly with dentists to help them understand the confusing credit card processing industry and save more of their hard-earned money with Best Card. In his free time, he is an avid hiker, constant reader and enjoys sharing those passions with his wife and young son.

The challenges and rewards of volunteering abroad

Editor’s note: In February 1970, a group of dental students met in Chicago to form an independent national dental student organization and named themselves the Student American Dental Association (SADA). The following year the ADA embraced this idea and organized a meeting of student representatives from each dental school in the country to help form a new organization called the American Student Dental Association (ASDA). Although scattered all over the world, several of the founders and leaders of those two organizations planned on having a reunion this year in celebration of their 50th anniversary, but it was scuttled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, they decided to mark this auspicious occasion by writing and publishing a series of seven articles regarding the state of dentistry, dental education and health care in general from a retrospective perspective. The first two articles in the series were on licensure reform and were published in the July 14 and Aug. 24 issues of the New Dentist News . This is the fourth article of the series.

In the summer of 2003, I suddenly found myself confronting a profound sense of guilt. It had been 20 plus years since I left the faculty at the University of Pennsylvania in 1981 with a plan to set up a large group practice in the Philadelphia suburbs. Within two years I had established two facilities in large regional malls, and  had devoted virtually all my time and energy to my patients and my practice. The time to give back to society in some shape or form was long overdue.

I decided that I wanted to do volunteer work of some kind, but it was a vague goal – a plan with no details. I had no idea how to proceed. What I did know was that my admiration for the work of Doctors Without Borders was a motivation to volunteer in a foreign country.

I contacted the ADA for information, and they proved to be a rich resource of information. I researched volunteer agencies with experience in placements abroad, and discussed my idea with several friends who had travel experience in Southeast Asia. They all raved about Thailand.

My business partner, Dr. Edward Basner, who had served as a dentist in the Air Force in Northern Thailand, loved his experience there, especially doing volunteer missions in the surrounding communities. He told me that the people there were warm, friendly and incredibly appreciative.

Photo of Dr. Nash
Dr. Nash

All roads pointed to Thailand even though I had never been there and quite frankly knew very little about the country.

Next, I contacted Dr. Barry Simmons, the founder of Dental Health International, who was widely considered the guru of volunteer dentistry abroad, and a true humanitarian. He had famously spent several months each year in the most remote areas around the world, by himself, transporting his own mobile instruments and custom-designed equipment at his own expense.

I visited him in Athens, Georgia, and his advice and encouragement was invaluable. He too had spent considerable time in northern Thailand and strongly recommended that I go there. We decided on a mobile dental outreach project for remote Hilltribe highland communities in the mountains of Chiangmai Province.

Chiangmai is the second largest of Thailand’s 77 provinces, and home to Chiangmai City, one of the oldest (circa 1296) and second largest city in Thailand. The Hilltribe people are actually nine different tribes of various ethnic origins who have resided in the high mountainous terrain for centuries, primarily as migratory subsistence farmers. They comprise approximately 13% of the Thai population, and are the largest group of non-Buddhists in the country.

But how was I going to make this happen?

An organization called Global Crossroad/Asia Volunteers helped me formulate my project and introduced me to a government hospital in Hangdong Township, and the dental school in Chiangmai.

In April 2004, I made my first trip to Chiangmai to meet with my contacts who would become my sponsors and friends – Dr. Wannasee, the dental director at Hangdong Hospital; Dr. Wirat, the dean of the dental school; and Dr. Kumkom, the chairwoman of community Dentistry. Fortunately, they all spoke English very well. They informed me that the hospital and dental school had already established their own mobile outreach initiatives, and all I had to do was customize them to my needs and join in. What would be unique however was that it would be the first time that a foreign dentist worked with them, shoulder-to-shoulder, out in the field.

I returned in December for my initial three-week project. I was informed that Dean Wirat had made a special trip to the dental board in Bangkok to secure a temporary dental license for me, a detail that I hadn’t even considered.

Hangdong Hospital arranged for the locations, coordinated with the locals for the dates, provided transport for all the equipment and instruments (on flat-bed, four-wheel drive trucks), brought technicians to set-up, hook-up, and service the mobile equipment on site, set up the open-air “operatories” and all the sterilized and bagged instruments on trays, and made sure that the word got out that we were coming to provide free dental care to anyone who needed it.

Schools in the area transported their kids on the back of pickup trucks and many of the locals would arrive on motorbike and just walk-in. The hospital staff screened and triaged the patients and placed them in a queue. I would work alongside three of the hospital dentists and four dental nurses, who also served as my translators.

We serviced three remote villages, using on-site health centers for water and electric hookups and operating space, and saw hundreds of patients, mostly kids, doing mostly extractions and simple fillings. The amount of severe decay that I witnessed was quite an eye-opening experience.

The second phase of the project was organized by the dental school, which had a mobile clinic/bus. I accompanied their staff on two outreach projects to rural health centers, once again providing mostly oral surgical services. We also went to three rural schools in the area to give out toothbrushes, toothpaste, provide good oral health education, do dental screenings and onsite extractions for those kids who had infection and pain.

It was my first time performing dentistry in the field without the benefit of X-rays. I learned to accept it as a fact of life that was required under the circumstances; a compromise that was needed to provide relief of pain and infection to people who had little or no access to dental care.

This turned out to be a great life-changing experience for me. The people I met and worked with were welcoming, friendly, incredibly helpful, and appreciative of my participation. In March 2005, I returned for what would prove to be my final volunteer mission. My project ended when my sponsors Dean Wirat retired and Dr. Kumkom went on sabbatical.

I returned to Philadelphia, decided to retire, sold my dental practice, and moved permanently to Thailand in September 2005 to live in Hangdong – the place I had never even heard about before my trip the previous year. I have lived happily here ever since.

Photo of clinic in Thailand
Open: Volunteers, including Dr. Nash, worked in open-air “operatories” set up by Hangdong Hospital.

For those who might be considering volunteering abroad, here are my suggestions and tips:

1. It can be a dangerous world out there – find a safe place and carefully research your choices. Of course, for many Americans who only speak English, an English-speaking destination is probably preferable, but not required. It’s best not to attempt to do this strictly on your own. Find a reputable volunteer placement service to help you, even if there are fees involved.

The ADA provides a valuable guide to international volunteer resources and a database of programs that you should check out:
2. You will need to secure necessary visas and provide proof of vaccinations if they are required, and make sure your passport is valid for at least six months beyond your return. It’s a good idea to obtain an official letter of introduction from your sponsors in case there are any questions at Immigration & Customs when you arrive at your destination.

3. Once you have settled on your venue, it would be most prudent, if feasible, to organize a preliminary “scouting mission” to introduce yourself, personally cultivate local contacts and resources, and confirm and finalize the operational details of your project. Undoubtedly, there will be surprises and unanticipated glitches to deal with, but a preliminary visit should help to keep them to a minimum.

4. A clinical project obviously requires instruments, equipment, sterilization, and a million other things – an almost impossible task to manage by yourself in a foreign country unless you are a Barry Simmons, who is a one-in-a-million. I was fortunate to fall into pre-existing outreach programs, with local clinicians and administrators who maintained ongoing responsibility for quality assurance, continuity, patient follow-up, and sustainability - essential features for any volunteer project. They welcomed my participation and helped me to integrate into their systems and protocols. Thankfully, all of the myriad of details were already provided, which enabled me to focus on my role as a field clinician. In looking back, I think that this was an ideal situation – one that I highly recommend if you can find it.

5. Last, but not least, you will need to find out about dental licensure requirements, even for volunteering, in your host country. Institutional licensure and temporary licensure are two of the most common methods. However, many countries are so in need and appreciative that it  may simply be a non-issue.

Dr. Nash was ASDA’s first chair of dental licensure reform from 1971–72. He graduated from New York University College of Dentistry in 1971 as valedictorian of his class. After graduation he completed a one-year general practice residency at Brookdale Hospital in Brooklyn, N.Y, and a three-year postdoc in medical behavioral science at the University of Kentucky Medical School. In 1976 he joined the faculty at the University. of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine as the director of the DAU/TEAM Program. In 1981 he founded Century Dental Centers, an interdisciplinary group practice in the Philadelphia suburbs. He remained in private practice until 2005 when he retired and moved to Chiangmai, Thailand, where he currently resides with his wife Walaporn.

Recommended Content


© 2023 American Dental Association